On 2/23/2006 9:33 AM, Vivek Khera wrote:

> On Feb 22, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> 
>> That's probably worthy of some sort of extra code path in the cleanup
>> loop; if there are no nodes other than the local one, old events  
>> should
>> be treated as confirmed...
>>
>> That needs a bit of thought...
> 
> should i file a formal bug report?

Yes, please do so. In the meantime, a workaround would have been to 
recreate the replica and start its slon daemon, but NOT yet subscribe 
it. This would have caused events to be confirmed and the cleanup 
eventually to take place.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #