Sun Feb 12 14:35:54 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] what constitutes a suitable 'primary key'?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] what constitutes a suitable 'primary key'?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Marc G. Fournier" <marc at pgsql.com> writes: > Apparently a UNIQUE index doesn't? > > =# \d bit1 > Table "public.bit1" > Column | Type | Modifiers > ---------------+-----------------------------+--------------- > instance_id | integer | not null > instance_name | character varying(500) | not null > created_on | timestamp without time zone | default now() > code | text | > md5sum | text | > status | text | > activated_on | text | > esdnet_uuid | text | > license | text | > account_uuid | text | > Indexes: > "bit1_instance_id_key" UNIQUE, btree (instance_id) > "bit1lin_idx" btree (lower(instance_name::text)) > > Gets reported by slony has having no primary key: > > ERROR: Slony-I: table "public"."bit1" has no primary key > > So, just to clarify before I do it, all tables that have 'just a UNIQUE > key', I'll still have to do 'ALTER TABLE <table> ADD PRIMARY KEY ( field > );' to so that Slony likes them? In the Slonik "set add table" command, you can specify which key to use if there is no true primary key. -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "ofni.sailifa.ac" "@" "enworbbc")) <http://dba2.int.libertyrms.com/> Christopher Browne (416) 673-4124 (land)
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] what constitutes a suitable 'primary key'?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] what constitutes a suitable 'primary key'?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list