Wed Sep 7 14:32:32 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Is non-sequential node numbering okay?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Is non-sequential node numbering okay?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:32:43PM -0400, Jim Archer wrote: > Hi All... > > Is there any requirement about how nodes are numbered? I see that there > is a requirement that there be a node 1 (although the FAQ says there does > not really) but I'm wondering if I can number them like 1, 101, 201, 202 > and so on. I am thinking that I can create a scheme where 1xx nodes are > in one city, 2xx in another, 3xx in yet another and so on. > > Do I really need a node 1? If not, I would start at 101. You can number them any way that you want and you don't need a node 1 in your cluster. If you decide to not have a node 1, you should note that the event node parameter for many slonik commands defaults to node 1, so you'll have to specify event node if you don't have a node 1. Tim > > Thanks... > > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general -- Tim Goodaire 416-673-4126 tgoodair at ca.afilias.info Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20050907/71b6d012/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Is non-sequential node numbering okay?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Is non-sequential node numbering okay?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list