Wed Oct 5 18:50:14 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Project administration (was: Announcement: Version 1.1.1 )
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Project administration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 11:19:27AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:39:44PM -0700, David Fetter wrote: > > 1. Is the Afilias QA team on this list? If not, which lists are > > they on? We all need to get in better touch here. > > Not as far as I know; but to be more pointed, Afilias _does not_ do > the QA of these releases before they happen. The Afilias QA folks > do testing of proposed releases to production systems for Afilias > purposes, but they don't test this software before it's released. > (This state of affairs is admittedly partly because, when I was > supervising Chris[1], I could alter his job description to include > maintenance of Slony-I; but it's been well over a year since I had > any supervisory duties of the QA folks, so I couldn't assign them > the work. But in truth, the QA folks at Afilias are already > overcommitted.) Slony-I was always intended to be a community > project: Afilias seeded it, but it's not an Afilias project released > to the community, and was never intended to be. Thanks for clarifying that. > > 2. What exactly is the release process, and where is a broad, > > obvious place to post it? > > It sounds like one needs to be made. Volunteers? Looks like I proposed one, and who proposes, volunteers. I'll whip something together this weekend if nobody else wants to. > > 3. What regression tests are running, and how do we know they've > > passed on all platforms? I know this is a tough thing even just > > in a combinatorial sense, but it's one we have to do. > > My suspicion is that this will fall out of (2). That's my suspicion, too :) > In particular, I don't think that there are currently assurances > that people have run the tests prior to release. While on the one > hand, that seems like a pretty bad thing, on the other hand, it's > more or less how PostgreSQL itself was released for ages. That > said. . . > > > 4. The subject of a "build farm" has come up several times in > > different venues. Can we get this thing spec'ed and put together > > in time for 1.2? What design pieces are still missing? > > . . .this'd no doubt help. But I don't know the answer to your > questions. Heh. Looks like a pretty good thing to me :) Would we be starting with the buildfarm stuff, some other framework, or building one from scratch? > [1] For those who are curious, I've been assigned to a new > department at Afilias, so I'm not part of the database operations > group there any more. Congratulations :) Cheers, D -- David Fetter david at fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote!
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Project administration (was: Announcement: Version 1.1.1 )
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Project administration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list