-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Jan Wieck wrote:

> Which actually shows that we are not testing our releases for all "supported" 
> versions. This is really bad and basically shows that Andrew is right with 
> his claim that 1.0 was a better release. There will be no more releases 
> without a complete list of PG-Branch reports. Who else needs to nod on 
> release (package maintainers like Devrim)?

I began installing slony to *all* of my build platforms, to which I'll 
replicate my web database. Slony will be built from CVS manually (and will 
be installed from RPMs except FreeBSD ;) ) ). This means that I'll be able 
to test slony on Red Hat / Fedora Core platforms and also be able to test 
the RPMs on much platforms. Currently there are test installs on FreeBSD 
(master), RH9, FC4, RHEL 3 and RHEL 4 (slave) but needs some work on them. 
So there will be very stable reports for my platforms.

I'm *very* busy this weekend. I'll finish it the week after.

So I think this is what I can do for Slony (since I can't contribute 
the code :) )

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bili?im Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
                       http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDe6xI4zE8DGqpiZARAtoYAJ0a3l/Oaybr3ERyHcIMdqs0j2EPQwCghLQu
TP9ZCrF9nU6rsjuyIw1mOyo=
=k26r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----