On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:28:16PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> It would be _possible_ to have two sets in one cluster, and that
> _could_ have the merit of cutting down slightly on the number of slon
> processes.  The latter would happen if you decided to have a database
> "provision_order" which subscribed to both sets.  The two
> subscriptions could be managed by one slon ==> "one slon saved."

Ah right, make the 2 db's each members of the cluster ... forgot
about that.

-- 
When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will
understand why I dismiss yours