Wed Jan 12 23:51:03 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] using forward vs. direct subscription
- Next message: [Slony1-general] 1.0.6?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:54:44PM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote: > > - If B subscribes directly to C, then it will get those updates more > quickly than if it waits for them to be provided by node A. > > - If B subscribes to A, for the updates originating on C, then it won't > get them as quickly as if they came direct from C, but this reduces the > load on node C. Also, I guess this is obvious, but if any of the data on A depends on the data which comes from C, then you _must_ subscribe through A. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] using forward vs. direct subscription
- Next message: [Slony1-general] 1.0.6?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list