Wed Dec 7 16:18:18 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Database encoding issues and slony
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Database encoding issues and slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 12:00:32PM +0100, Andreas Pflug wrote: > IMHO slony should behave as a unicode application, i.e. use UTF8 client > encoding for all database connections. This will have pgsql apply > conversions transparently, because most server encodings can convert > happily from and to UTF8. This seems like an unreasonable imposition on people who aren't using UTF8. What if the application can't speak UTF8, but needs multibyte? That's a serious issue in parts of Japan, where there are some rather fraught politics around Unicode. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca It is above all style through which power defers to reason. --J. Robert Oppenheimer
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Database encoding issues and slony
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Database encoding issues and slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list