On 9/22/2004 11:19 PM, ahammond at ca.afilias.info wrote:

>>> Much care must be taken when doing so; this strategy was taken with
>>> eRServer, and occasionally lead to some (ahem) "unfortunate
>>> deadlocks."
>>
>> Which was required because the design was done agains PG 7.1, where no
>> lazy vacuum existed.
> 
> It's not in the official 745 tree either, is it? I know we've got it in
> the -afilias tree that we use in production. But we've never been able to
> find time to send it through QA so haven't actually been able to enable it
> in production.

You mixed up "lazy vacuum" with "vacuum delay". The former is the 
non-condensing one that does not require an exclusive table lock any 
more, done by Tom.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #