Tue Oct 26 01:22:05 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How to tell slave status?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Purpose of sl_log_1 vs. sl_log_2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday September 22 2004 9:14, Jan Wieck wrote: > On 9/22/2004 6:10 PM, Christopher Browne wrote: > > "Ed L." <pgsql at bluepolka.net> writes: > >> I see that sl_log_1 "stores each change to be propagated to > >> subscriber nodes." Can anyone explain the purpose of sl_log_1 > >> vs. sl_log_2? Looking at the source, it appears the same data is > >> inserted into both. > > > > Eventually the plan is for the triggers to insert data into either or > > the other, which means that we're "free" do maintenance on the table > > not presently in use. > > The logswitch and vacuum full or truncate will be done on a daily or > weekly base, or even on operator request only. This will take care of a > logtable bloat due to prolonged downtime of a subscriber. How do you trigger a switch between sl_log_1 and sl_log_2? Is this functionality implemented? Ed
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How to tell slave status?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Purpose of sl_log_1 vs. sl_log_2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list