Ed L. pgsql
Wed Oct 20 00:33:51 PDT 2004
On Tuesday October 19 2004 11:20, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 10/19/2004 10:10 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 07:49:09AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> >> transaction. A dummy update like "set relname=relname" is enough.
> >
> > It hasn't always been enough for me, is what I'm saying.  Also, Tom
> > Lane once warned me that he thought there were still some lingering
> > bits of code where the tg_enabled flag wasn't checked.
> >
> > A
>
> Which would be because nobody ever used that flag. With 1.0.3 available
> and those changes only intended for 1.1, why not make Slony the "pusher"
> to find all those spots, squeeze them out of the code, have new dot
> releases for 7.3.x and newer and force users to upgrade to the latest
> patchlevel in their release branch, if they want to use Slony 1.1 ?

I have some certain needs for using slony to replicate 7.3.4 into both 7.3.4 
and into 8.0.  Am I hearing you correctly that my options for 7.3.4->7.3.4 
and 7.3.4->8.0 replication are 1.0.3 ONLY?  (Unless I want to be the guinea 
pig for finding the overlooked tg_enabled spots in the Pgsql code?)

Ed



More information about the Slony1-general mailing list