Thu Oct 14 15:33:29 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] problem with the read-ony slave database
- Next message: [Slony1-general] problem with the read-ony slave database
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:28:52PM +0200, tohny at netcourrier.com wrote: > Thanks for your response Andrew > for information, the master and the slave are on a server with > the same configuration, and the same applications on it. So i wonder > why my queries are slower on the slave than on the master. The > only difference between the database is that the master is read/write > and the slave read only. Perhaps the slon process could have an impact > on the performance ?? Have you another idea ? How much slower? Are you getting different plans? Are they on the _same_ server? Are they fetching from the same disk? The same filesystem? What are your settings of these? It's hard to answer your question without a whole lot more background. But I can tell you for sure that being a replica does not automatically slow down a system. In fact, the opposite is more likely. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary and imaginative work need not end up well. --Dennis Ritchie
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] problem with the read-ony slave database
- Next message: [Slony1-general] problem with the read-ony slave database
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list