On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 13:30, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 10/6/2004 1:01 PM, Brad Hilton wrote:
> > Jan Wieck wrote:
> >>> However, this is a serious bug since user defined tyes without any 
> >>> operators are of course legal in Postgres and have to be supported by 
> >>> Slony. I am working on a fix for it.
> >> 
> >> This is fixed in REL_1_0_STABLE and HEAD, so it will be included in the 
> >> upcoming version 1.0.3.
> > 
> > Thank you - it does seem to have fixed the crashes! :)
> > 
> > I'm now seeing a new issue when the initial copy starts up.  Slon logs 
> > this on my slave database:
> 
> Oh crap ... well, so much for using truncate instead of delete at all. I 
> will back out that attempt :-/

Out of curiosity, how do you deal with a non cascading delete, like
RESTRICT?

Part #2, if you deal with the above, perhaps a cascading truncate would
solve the issue?