Thu Nov 25 22:18:09 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] [development] Names or oid's that is the question
- Next message: [Slony1-general] losing data on initial enable subscribtion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On November 19, 2004 01:44 pm, you wrote: > On November 19, 2004 12:27 pm, Christopher Browne wrote: > > Darcy Buskermolen <darcy at wavefire.com> writes: > > > On November 18, 2004 07:48 am, Christopher Browne wrote: > > >>I have the following as somewhat "version-unaware" upgrade scheme > > >>which can cope with the case of needing to add a column to a table: > > >> > > >> create or replace function @NAMESPACE at .add_missing_table_field (text, > > >> text, text, text) returns bool as ' > > It's something of a "stub" function, at this point; the notion is to > > have a function there for upgrade activities to accrete into. > > > > Further, it's a bit of a "trial balloon;" if it seems sensible, then > > it's sensible to continue. If it's not, then it should disappear... > > it looks to be senseable to me, Just a matter of ironing out the details of > how we want to handle the actual upgrade in slonik beyond just sending a > notify _cluster.Restart. Chris, what were your thoughts on how you figured > this should be handled. At the moment I'm leaning towards a function in > slony_funcs.sql that you just serialize the placement of perform > upgrade_foo into? Further to this discusion I have prepared a bit more detail on what I'm envisioning in the upgrade method. http://www.dbitech.ca/slony/slonyupgrade.diff any comments or theory debunking would be most welcomed. -- Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. ph: 250.717.0200 fx: 250.763.1759 http://www.wavefire.com
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] [development] Names or oid's that is the question
- Next message: [Slony1-general] losing data on initial enable subscribtion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list