I wonder if it could have something to do with length of table names, 
then?

-tfo

On Jul 29, 2004, at 5:26 PM, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:

> Ok I'm testing a solution now and so far so good, 6 hours into testing 
> it's
> mannaged to add the 7,500 set add table statements for tables with 
> primary
> keys and its 5300 of the way through the 9,500 table add key/set add 
> table
> statement pairs for  tables without primary keys with out a catch so 
> far.
>
> (Ohh how a long for a faster development system...)