Thu Jul 29 23:57:06 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] sl_event.ev_type: ENABLE_NODE, but no DISABLE_NODE
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_event.ev_type: ENABLE_NODE, but no DISABLE_NODE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Browne wrote: > Justin Clift <jc at telstra.net> writes: <snip> > > Hmm. I'd be game to create a descriptive table for that, and have > sl_event point to that as a "foreign key" validation... No idea how that would change things. Those values are presently pretty much hard coded into the slony code though. But, I'm not a C expert so couldn't really say. :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] sl_event.ev_type: ENABLE_NODE, but no DISABLE_NODE
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_event.ev_type: ENABLE_NODE, but no DISABLE_NODE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list