Thomas F.O'Connell tfo
Fri Jul 23 12:08:34 PDT 2004
Could it not just be the case that there is a perl directory in the 
distribution that contains scripts and modules for those who have it 
but that the core functionality remains always accessible via slonik?

Similary for windowed utilities.

-tfo

On Jul 21, 2004, at 2:47 PM, David Fetter wrote:

> Kind people,
>
> I'd like to propose that we require Perl for configuration &
> installation, rather than doing the kind of wacky machinations that
> assuming sed-only forces on benighted projects.
>
> This is not 1994, and Perl is not the rarity it was that year.
>
> We already require a fairly modern version of PostgreSQL, and
> requiring (say) Perl 5.6 or better is really not onerous.
>
> What say ye?



More information about the Slony1-general mailing list