Fri Jul 23 12:08:34 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Requirements
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Requirements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Could it not just be the case that there is a perl directory in the distribution that contains scripts and modules for those who have it but that the core functionality remains always accessible via slonik? Similary for windowed utilities. -tfo On Jul 21, 2004, at 2:47 PM, David Fetter wrote: > Kind people, > > I'd like to propose that we require Perl for configuration & > installation, rather than doing the kind of wacky machinations that > assuming sed-only forces on benighted projects. > > This is not 1994, and Perl is not the rarity it was that year. > > We already require a fairly modern version of PostgreSQL, and > requiring (say) Perl 5.6 or better is really not onerous. > > What say ye?
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Requirements
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Requirements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list