http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230

--- Comment #4 from Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> 2011-08-11 04:46:12 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The definition seems generally reasonable.
> 
> One caveat is that ~ isn't portable when applied to signed operands, so if we
> have any platforms where bool has, underlying it, a signed type, then there
> could be some unhappiness.

I suspect this is the root cause of the unhappiness to begin with, I think this
patch makes the casting happen on both sides of the operator.

Should we just do

#define true (bool) 1
#define false (bool) 0

?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.