http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174

--- Comment #5 from Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> 2010-12-09 13:02:58 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Proposed...  Add a table that will be replicated via event publishing that
> captures tuples of the form [excluder, excludee]
> 
> That is, node [excluder] will ignore events coming from node [excludee].
> 
> (Open question: Will it just be SYNC events that are ignored?  Seems quite
> likely apropos...)

How would WAIT FOR (todays manual WAIT FOR - ignoring any automatic one) work
if you ignore non sync events?  

Also, just because node 1 is excluding node 4 doesn't mean that node 3 is
excluding node 4 (it probably isn't).  How will WAIT FOR change.

Also what are the implications with respect to FAILOVER and MOVE SET or
rehshaping a subscription for this change.

Also can you propose some syntax for making a node excluded?

What happens if you no longer want a node to be excluded?  Especially if the
events have already been deleted on the excluder.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.